Woo’s suggested new rule would mean Upper Chamber leaders would effectively own Senate committee seats: Cordy

It has been suggested that not agreeing to this change has resulted in the Senate being held hostage. But if this change proceeds, it would be Senators themselves who would be held hostage.

The Senate National Security and Defence Committee, pictured June 10, 2019. A new rule change that has been proposed recently by Senator Yuen Pau Woo—and raised again in routine negotiations—would remove ownership of committee seats from individual Senators and give additional whip-like powers to leaders, who would control the seats instead. I believe that this change is antithetical to the ideals of a more modern and independent Senate. Senators should not have to sacrifice their committee contributions if they no longer wish to remain in a group, writes Progressive Sen. Jane Cordy. The Hill Times photograph by Andrew Meade

Opinion

BY PROGRESSIVE SENATOR JANE CORDY

October 26, 2020

Like most Senators, Progressive Senators are in favour of a sustained focus on Senate modernization. We believe that our rules should reflect our practices, emphasize equality, and enshrine the rights of all Senators. At the same time, this important work of continuing to make our institution more m...

To keep reading, subscribe and become a political insider.

Only $7.76 a week for an annual subscription.

Enjoy unlimited website access and the digital newspaper.

Cancel anytime.

Already a Subscriber?

Get Weekend Point of View Newsletter

A round up of the past weekâ€™s opinion writers and columnists on Saturdays and Sundays.

By entering your email address you consent to receive email from The Hill Times containing news, analysis, updates and offers. You may unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy