Private member’s bill uses biosecurity and infectious diseases as a smokescreen 

Rather than passing an ag gag law to reduce transparency and target compassionate citizens who document animal suffering, Parliamentarians should focus on the real threat: the harmful underbelly of an industry lacking oversight of both biosecurity practices and the treatment of farmed animals.
On the rare occasions when concerned citizens have entered facilities without permission, they have documented horrific animal suffering, write Jan Hajek and Kaitlyn Mitchell.

A dangerous private member’s bill has passed through committee and is headed for its third reading in the House. Going into the study, conducted by the House Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, Liberal MP Francis Drouin suggested that 

To keep reading, subscribe and become a political insider.

Only $7.76 a week for an annual subscription.

Enjoy unlimited website access and the digital newspaper.

Cancel anytime.


Already a Subscriber?

Get Mondays: Environment Newsletter

From climate change to natural resources, dive into environmental legislation, policy, and advocacy.


By entering your email address you consent to receive email from The Hill Times containing news, analysis, updates and offers. You may unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy

MORE Opinion

RELATED STORIES