Using LNG for shipping will hurt the Arctic, not help it

When it’s burned, LNG produces less carbon dioxide than conventional fuels; however, significant leaks of unburned methane in both the extraction and use of LNG is causing serious damage to the climate.
There’s no question that shipping emissions are a huge and growing problem, accounting for roughly three per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions, but LNG is not the answer, writes Erin Abou-Abssi.
Last month, a new study came out touting the benefits of using liquefied natural gas—more commonly known as LNG—as a fuel for shipping in Arctic waters. It comes on the heels of other proposals across the country to expand the development and use of LNG in the shipping industry. Supporters of LN...

To keep reading, subscribe and become a political insider.

Only $7.76 a week for an annual subscription.

Enjoy unlimited website access and the digital newspaper.

Cancel anytime.


Already a Subscriber?

Get Weekend Point of View Newsletter

A round up of the past week’s opinion writers and columnists on Saturdays and Sundays.


By entering your email address you consent to receive email from The Hill Times containing news, analysis, updates and offers. You may unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy

MORE Opinion

RELATED STORIES