Freeland should stop calling CUSMA a victory, it is a defeat

CUSMA is just one part of a beggar-thy-neighbour U.S. strategy to reverse globalization and establish a Fortress North America economy. It reinforces U.S. power at the expense of Canada, with the risk that it could become a currency bloc as well, with further losses of policy independence.
Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, pictured with Canada's top free trade negotiator Steve Verheul on Feb. 18, 2020, before the House International Trade Committee. Mr. Verheul told MPs the goal of the U.S. was to 'rebalance' the agreement to benefit the U.S., not liberalize trade.
TORONTO—What’s perhaps most telling about the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) is that, unlike the North American Free Trade Agreement, it does not even use the words “free trade." It is just an agreement—and, in particular, it’s an agreement for managed trade and protectionism, not an...

To keep reading, subscribe and become a political insider.

Only $7.76 a week for an annual subscription.

Enjoy unlimited website access and the digital newspaper.

Cancel anytime.


Already a Subscriber?

Get Weekend Point of View Newsletter

A round up of the past week’s opinion writers and columnists on Saturdays and Sundays.


By entering your email address you consent to receive email from The Hill Times containing news, analysis, updates and offers. You may unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy

MORE Opinion

RELATED STORIES