Canada should be prepared to walk away from NAFTA if it can’t secure the best deal for Canadians

There have to be issues that are non-starters for Canada at the negotiating table.
U.S. demands funnelled through Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer—pictured in Ottawa with Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland—during the NAFTA renegotiation process shouldn’t come at the expense of Canadian prosperity, writes Walid Hejazi.
Free trade represents one of those rare areas where the majority of economists agree: when structured properly, significant benefits can accrue to all countries involved. NAFTA is a great example of such an agreement. It was implemented in 1994 and for the past 23 years, it has delivered increased ...

To keep reading, subscribe and become a political insider.

Only $7.76 a week for an annual subscription.

Enjoy unlimited website access and the digital newspaper.

Cancel anytime.


Already a Subscriber?

Get Tuesdays: Innovation & Industry Newsletter

The policies, decisions, and people working on investment and regulation in the industry and innovation realm.


By entering your email address you consent to receive email from The Hill Times containing news, analysis, updates and offers. You may unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy

MORE Opinion

RELATED STORIES