Pollution’s costs are large, growing, and poorly understood

Strong data demonstrating the costs of pollution is key to reducing them. The impacts are too great to allow the need for action to be obscured by weak data. The government is moving on carbon emissions because climate change is a clear and present threat. And because it has been well studied. Canadians should hope for nothing less with other pollutants.
In announcing Ottawa’s plans for a national carbon pricing system last month, the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Catherine McKenna rightly noted that the government was acting, in part, because 'pollution has a very significant impact on our health.' She might well have added 'and on our pocketbooks.'
In announcing Ottawa’s plans for a national carbon pricing system last month, the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Catherine McKenna rightly noted that the government was acting, in part, because “pollution has a very significant impact on our health.” She might well have added ...

To keep reading, subscribe and become a political insider.

Only $7.76 a week for an annual subscription.

Enjoy unlimited website access and the digital newspaper.

Cancel anytime.


Already a Subscriber?

Get Weekend Point of View Newsletter

A round up of the past week’s opinion writers and columnists on Saturdays and Sundays.


By entering your email address you consent to receive email from The Hill Times containing news, analysis, updates and offers. You may unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy

MORE Opinion

RELATED STORIES