Sadly, David Anderson misses point
Regarding "Kyoto Protocol is dead in 2004," by Bob Mills, MP (The Hill Times, Jan. 19 - 25), I am disappointed that he did not mention the primary reason that Kyoto should be rejected -- namely that the accord's science is fundamentally flawed and so its implementation will have no impact ...
SPONSORED CONTENT
Get Weekend Point of View Newsletter
A round up of the past week’s opinion writers and columnists on Saturdays and Sundays.
By entering your email address you consent to receive email from The Hill Times containing news, analysis, updates and offers. You may unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy












