Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Opinion

How do you solve a problem like IS defectors?

By Phil Gurski      

There is a growing literature on the subject of 'leaving terrorism' and I cannot disagree with the fact that some people do indeed abandon previously held ideas and commitments; it’s just that I cannot see a foolproof way forward.

A screenshot of an ISIS propaganda video showing Canadian John Maguire, a radicalized Canadian who supported the terrorist group, and who went by the name Abu Anwar al-Canadi. Maguire was actively calling for lone-wolf attacks on Canadian soil, before reportedly being killed near Kobani in early 2015.
Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

Years ago when I first joined the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, there was a veteran counter-terrorism guy, whom I’ll call ‘Mike’ in this article. Mike had been around a fair bit and I had a great deal of respect both for his experience and his insight into Islamist extremism. In all his time in the trenches he had seen a lot, talked to a lot of people, and acquired a lot of wisdom into terrorists and terrorism. One thing he told me more than a decade ago still resonates with me. He said that he had talked to a lot of Canadians who had fought with al-Qaeda or the Taliban in Afghanistan, and every single one of them told him that they were not terrorists but simply “drove the bus” in whatever camp or town they happened to live in at the time.

These words came back to me today when I came across an article in The Independent (a UK daily publication) containing an interview with a former Islamic State (IS) fighter. Part of it is worth quoting at length:

“If you listen to all these people who had left Daesh [ISIS], you’d think all they were doing was cooking or driving. I had no idea we had so many cooks and drivers! I wonder why we didn’t open lots of restaurants and a taxi service.”

And I immediately thought of Mike, who has long since retired from the Canadian government. Wherever you are Mike, I hope you are enjoying a well-deserved respite after decades of service to our country.

In these words lies the conundrum facing security intelligence agencies, law enforcement, the military, governments, and societies at large: what do we do with IS defectors—or anyone who claims to have left a terrorist group? There is no doubt that their departure can be seen as a treasure trove of intelligence and insider information into the plans and structures of extremist groups and that this data can help us understand these organizations and, perhaps, stop future plots. Some have even advocated getting these ex-terrorists to go public and undermine the ideology and appeal of these murderous criminals.

If they are indeed ex-terrorists.

How can we tell? Do we take these individuals at their word? There have been instances where those who claimed to have abandoned a group and who were brought in for talks were in fact nothing of the sort. The most famous case illustrating this deception was the Saudi member of al-Qaeda in Yemen who almost killed a prince with a bomb reportedly hidden in either his rectum or underwear —the details don’t really matter, as your private parts are no place for explosives.

Is it not possible that the leadership of groups like IS has already thought of this kind of attack, and that there may be several such “defectors” out there already?  Yes. It is not only possible, but probable, I would argue.  And I know of no way to reliably winnow the terrorist wheat from the defecting chaff.

Yes, a majority of those who say they’ve seen and done enough, and who thus want to leave the world of terrorism behind are possibly telling the truth.  But even if that is so, what then?  Do we “rehabilitate” them? How? Do we allow them to go back to a normal life? Do we charge them—based on what evidence?—and do we help them heal from their demons? Or, do we shun them for what they once were? All very good questions with no easy answers as far as I can see.

There is a growing literature on  the subject of ‘leaving terrorism’ and I cannot disagree with the fact that some people do indeed abandon previously held ideas and commitments; it’s just that I cannot see a foolproof way forward.  To my mind, caution is the best approach and we would be idiots to embrace every former terrorist just because he/she says they’ve changed their paths in life.

The true defectors will be found out in time—but the key is that we need to take that time to prevent bad things from happening.

Besides, if they were really all “just driving the bus,” perhaps they could demonstrate their skills in a real job—before the robots take over those positions.

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

Deadline looms for low-profile CPC candidates, who say party needs more fresh faces and ideas

The ‘traditional playbooks of smaller government, lower taxes, tough on crime,’ wont work to widen the blue tent, says one candidate. ‘We need to break the ceiling and win the support of more Canadians.’

Canada ‘very far’ from quarantining measures, says Trudeau, as feds announce $1-billion coronavirus fund

News|By Palak Mangat
'We have a responsibility to make sure Canada is ready for all scenarios,' Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told reporters Wednesday, as he announced a $1-billion package aimed at mitigating the spread.

‘Everything we didn’t do with Phoenix’: feds tap SAP for work on long-awaited Phoenix replacement pilot project

News|By Mike Lapointe
PIPSC president Debi Daviau says she ‘cannot complain at all on openness and transparency’ around process, but PSAC president Chris Aylward says he’s ‘very concerned’ about lack of details, consultation with his union.

Transportation Agency, RCMP among agencies with most missed targets in 2018-19, show late-tabled reports

In 2018-19, federal departments and agencies missed 509 performance targets out of the 2,011 targets tracked with a deadline of March 2019.

O’Regan putting nuclear ‘front and centre’ raises eyebrows, industry hopes

The announcement ‘doesn’t reflect what’s in his mandate letter,’ says NDP natural resources critic Richard Cannings, nor did nuclear energy didn’t come up in a briefing he had with the minister.

Cuban-Canadian relationship has remained strong regardless of governing party, says senior Cuban official

Feature|By Neil Moss
'I believe that our relationship for all these years has been guided by state policy,' says Marcelino Medina González.

Bennett defends process for reaching tentative deal with Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs

Theresa Tait-Day, president of the Wet’suwet’en Matrilineal Coalition, says women in her community have been sidelined amid the outcry from demonstrators who took to the streets.

Federal officials brief MPs, parliamentary staff on efforts to combat coronavirus

News|By Beatrice Paez

Vet MPs say future of Afghanistan up to Afghan people, as fragile U.S.-Taliban peace deal in balance

News|By Neil Moss
'You're ultimately there to set the conditions to allow the Afghans to sort of handle their own internal security challenges,' Conservative MP Alex Ruff says.
Trending Stories
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.